Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Common variance! [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut  – Vienna, Austria, 2012-06-12 03:03 (5123 d 18:41 ago) – Posting: # 8689
Views: 11,225

Hi ElMaestro!

❝ Everything is being LEAN'ed into dysfunctionality where management dictates a "yes we can"-attitude which is basically founded in hot air. Another syndrome is the "fight for it"-order that top management issues when studies have gone so pearshaped that noone (except management) believes it can be accepted by the regulatory authority.

Well said.

❝ Now I've said it. It feels good. I will now take my medicine. Sorry. Back into my cage.

Are you still “within pharmacological reach”? If ev’rything fails consider a hint of Schützomycin. Happy dreams!

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! 
Helmut Schütz


The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

• Curiosity: Running BE studies with more than 2 arms jag009 2012-06-11 15:01 
  • Common variance! Helmut 2012-06-11 16:23
    • Common variance! jag009 2012-06-11 17:25
      • Common variance! Helmut 2012-06-11 17:35
        • Common variance! jag009 2012-06-11 20:03
          • Common variance! ElMaestro 2012-06-11 20:34
            • Common variance!Helmut 2012-06-12 01:03
              • Common variance! ElMaestro 2012-06-12 13:22
    • Common variance! jag009 2012-06-12 19:56
      • What if I run a study with 2 references? jag009 2012-06-12 20:00
      • Common variance! Helmut 2012-06-12 20:39
        • Two References d_labes 2012-06-13 09:11
          • Two References jag009 2012-09-10 22:48
            • Two treatments only d_labes 2012-09-11 08:20
    • Common variance! jag009 2012-06-13 16:08