Common variance! [Design Issues]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2012-06-11 22:03 (5130 d 16:15 ago) – Posting: # 8687
Views: 11,265

Hi Helmut

:-D Everybody wants to kill two birds with one stone. What you essentially would need is a full adaptive design (adjusting for observed PEs and CVs). This is one of our member’s specialty. Acceptance? No idea.


I thought about adaptive design as well but then timing would become an issue since bioanalytical would be involved during the process? The stupid thing is we want to test all and hit the spot with one (hopefully). It is a resource (outsourcing) vs time issue.

I am the planner designer executioner (or whatever, not the one with the sickle), higher up gives the call (timeframe wise) :-|

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
269 visitors (1 registered, 268 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5