Nicotine Chewing gum [Design Issues]

posted by bharathi – India, 2011-12-23 05:56 (5297 d 05:12 ago) – Posting: # 7815
Views: 3,825

We are planning for a BE study of Nicotine Chewing gum

1) Innovator adds Overages (unofficial data, supported by assay values (mean of 10 gums) of 10 batches (106 -108%)

Justification for their overage may be - manufacturing loss/nicotine in the cud after chewing for 30 minutes is around 20%
Our product doesn't need any overages (no manufacturing loss, cud analysis after chewing is 0%)
Obviously assay value of our product will be 95- 100%, even if it is 100%, there is a minimum difference of 6% (more than 5% limit given in the EU guideline)
How can we justify this?

2) Baseline correction

LLOQ = 10 - 12% of Cmax, so if we go without baseline (0 -12% error adds up)
Is it better to go with baseline or without baseline correction?

3) Exclusion criteria

LLOQ being 10 -12% (How can we exclude subjects with baseline more than 5% of Cmax?)

Please can you clarify/suggest -


Edit: Category changed and subject line changed. Helmut

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
145 visitors (0 registered, 145 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5