Nicotine Chewing gum [Design Issues]
We are planning for a BE study of Nicotine Chewing gum
1) Innovator adds Overages (unofficial data, supported by assay values (mean of 10 gums) of 10 batches (106 -108%)
Justification for their overage may be - manufacturing loss/nicotine in the cud after chewing for 30 minutes is around 20%
Our product doesn't need any overages (no manufacturing loss, cud analysis after chewing is 0%)
Obviously assay value of our product will be 95- 100%, even if it is 100%, there is a minimum difference of 6% (more than 5% limit given in the EU guideline)
How can we justify this?
2) Baseline correction
LLOQ = 10 - 12% of Cmax, so if we go without baseline (0 -12% error adds up)
Is it better to go with baseline or without baseline correction?
3) Exclusion criteria
LLOQ being 10 -12% (How can we exclude subjects with baseline more than 5% of Cmax?)
Please can you clarify/suggest -
Edit: Category changed and subject line changed. Helmut
1) Innovator adds Overages (unofficial data, supported by assay values (mean of 10 gums) of 10 batches (106 -108%)
Justification for their overage may be - manufacturing loss/nicotine in the cud after chewing for 30 minutes is around 20%
Our product doesn't need any overages (no manufacturing loss, cud analysis after chewing is 0%)
Obviously assay value of our product will be 95- 100%, even if it is 100%, there is a minimum difference of 6% (more than 5% limit given in the EU guideline)
How can we justify this?
2) Baseline correction
LLOQ = 10 - 12% of Cmax, so if we go without baseline (0 -12% error adds up)
Is it better to go with baseline or without baseline correction?
3) Exclusion criteria
LLOQ being 10 -12% (How can we exclude subjects with baseline more than 5% of Cmax?)
Please can you clarify/suggest -
Edit: Category changed and subject line changed. Helmut
Complete thread:
- Nicotine Chewing gumbharathi 2011-12-23 04:56
- EMA: content correction – if justified Helmut 2011-12-23 15:00
