metformin SR steady state study [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-04-26 16:17 (5538 d 00:09 ago) – Posting: # 6940
Views: 5,416

Dear Jagan,

you crossposted already at David’s PKPD-list. In case you didn’t receive my answer last Friday, see below:

The difference between FDA and EMA is that FDA has published – besides the general guidances – 822 product specific guidances. Your study design should be based on science first. Do you really think that EMA wants you to risk hypoglycemic episodes in your study, just because nothing specifically to prevent them is stated in the European BE guideline?
BTW, what do you think about following section of the GL (4.1.4 Study conduct, Standardisation):

In rare cases, the use of a concomitant medication is needed for all subjects for safety […] reasons.


Rose

is a rose
is a rose
is a rose
(Gertrude Stein)

Guidelines

are guidelines
are guidelines
(Henrike Potthast, German BfArM)



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
101 visitors (0 registered, 101 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5