Extra (standby) subjects [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-02-08 13:47 (5620 d 17:38 ago) – Posting: # 6590
Views: 4,354

Dear Brijesh!

❝ Could you please also let me know, if this is the same requirement as far as the FDA requirements are concerned. Has FDA mentioned this requirement anywhere in their guidance.


Do you know the Guideline Collection? Why don't you do your homework first?

Sponsors should enter a sufficient number of subjects in the study to allow for dropouts. Because replacement of subjects during the study could complicate the statistical model and analysis, dropouts generally should not be replaced. Sponsors who wish to replace dropouts during the study should indicate this intention in the protocol. The protocol should also state whether samples from replacement subjects, if not used, will be assayed. If the dropout rate is high and sponsors wish to add more subjects, a modification of the statistical analysis may be recommended. Additional subjects should not be included after data analysis unless the trial was designed from the beginning as a sequential or group sequential design.

Do you see the differences to EMA?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
324 visitors (0 registered, 324 guests [including 29 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5