Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • IVIV (maybe C)

IVIV (maybe C) [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2011-01-18 16:23 (5632 d 09:31 ago) – Posting: # 6443
Views: 5,449

Dear Dan!

❝ you are right.

As are you.

❝ Once you have a bioequivalent product it is IMHO easier to find reasons for

❝ the discrepancy than the other way round.

Exactly.
Jean-Michel Cardot (one of the preachers of IVVC), always tries to break the news to noobs: Start in vivo!

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Drug X BE study rahul dixit 2011-01-14 09:00
- Drug X BE study Dr_Dan 2011-01-14 14:57
  - Drug X BE study rahul dixit 2011-01-15 07:53
    - Drug X BE study Dr_Dan 2011-01-17 14:59
      - Drug X BE study rahul dixit 2011-01-18 06:00
        
        Drug X BE study Dr_Dan 2011-01-18 09:40
        
        IVIV (no C) Helmut 2011-01-18 11:11
        
        IVIV (no C) Dr_Dan 2011-01-18 11:55
        
        IVIV (maybe C)Helmut 2011-01-18 15:23
        
        IVIV (maybe C) rahul dixit 2011-01-19 05:14
        
        IVIV (maybe C) Dr_Dan 2011-01-19 10:07
        Posture Helmut 2011-01-19 10:52
        
        Posture rahul dixit 2011-01-19 13:28

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
158 visitors (0 registered, 158 guests [including 34 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic. Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz