Drug X BE study [Design Issues]

posted by rahul dixit – 2011-01-14 10:00 (5645 d 13:52 ago) – Posting: # 6414
Views: 6,848

Dear All,
we had worked on angiotensin receptor antagonist. The molecule has inherent variability.
It has bioavailability of 13 % and also has a regiospecific absorption (from duodenum to jejunum). We carried study where we compared two test formulations with the innovator. The study was completed in three period. The study was marginally failed. when the data was analysed, it was observed that the varibaility in period three was on higher side as compared to period 1 and 2. The higher variability in period three is irrespective of the formulations dosed to the healthy volunteers. The variability in Cmax is given below.

Formulations % CV values
           TestProduct1   TestProduct2     Reference        
Period 1       34.94          35.61          65.89
Period 2       34.81          34.59          42.48
Period 3       26.61          28.22          50.57


The 90 % CI values are given below
                 Cmax          AUC 0-t       AUC 0-inf
(T2 Vs R)    72.05-101.45    69.63-98.88    70.31-97.80
(T1 Vs R)    66.36- 93.43    67.83-96.33    68.95-95.90


The dissolution profiles of the molecule are carried out in multi pH media (0.1 N HCl, pH 4.5, pH 6.8 and pH7.4)

The molecule is insoluble at pH 4.5 (2-3 % dissolution) while it is sparingly soluble in acid and has good solubility above pH 6.0. The dissolution profile of the in house test product is matching in all media with that of innovator.

Considering the above results, we are unable to understand the causes of failure in BE study.
Kindly suggest
Regards
Rahul


Edit: Please don't use tabs in posts - use BBCodes instead. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
179 visitors (0 registered, 179 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5