Multiple dose study fasting or fed? [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-07-05 17:15 (5835 d 21:19 ago) – Posting: # 5593
Views: 3,388

Dear Heema!

❝ [...] based on current guideline (CPMP/EWP/280/96), total three studies are

❝ recommended 1) single dose fast, 2) single dose fed and 3) multiple dose

❝ steady state.


❝ The reference listed drug is recommended with meal as a bid regimen. Also,

❝ it is reported that there is no food effect on bioavailability of this drug.


1) to 3) is correct for prolonged release formulations (Section 5.1 and Appendix 1; Data indicating no food effect). Not sure if 3) is necessary for delayed release formulations (Section 5.2) - but in the past regulators routinely asked for multiple dose studies of this MR type as well.

❝ Now my question is: should we conduct a steady state study under fed

❝ state or fasted state?


Since there is no indication of a food effect and the innovator labeled the formulation to be administered with food, I would say there could be some reasons not connected with PK, e.g. gastrointestional disturbances or other AEs. The single dose study fasting should be the most discriminatory one, anyhow. If my assumptions about AEs are correct, I would consider it unethical to perform the multiple dose study fasting (against the SmPC).
Interested in other opinions.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
387 visitors (0 registered, 387 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5