Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Why not? [Design Issues]

posted by HV – India, 2010-04-14 21:19 (5918 d 18:59 ago) – Posting: # 5139
Views: 3,190

❝ Why do you think that it is not possible?

Dear Helmut,
thanks for prompt response!
i think so, because overall extent of absorption is of importance for such NTIs. And the truncated approach repesents only a fraction of total extent. Will you please share your thoughts on application of truncted area (AUC72) for NTIs as well?

Thanks,

Heema

Complete thread:

Truncated approach for NTI? HV 2010-04-14 18:37
- Why not? Helmut 2010-04-14 18:48
  - Why not?HV 2010-04-14 19:19
    - Absorption important Helmut 2010-04-14 19:38

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
355 visitors (0 registered, 355 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks. Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz