Truncated AUC (once again) [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-03-22 15:43 (5943 d 18:43 ago) – Posting: # 4957
Views: 3,729

Dear Pankaj!

❝ I was aware of both Parallel and Truncated design individually. But wasn't

❝ sure whether I can club Parallel with truncation model since it is not

❝ clearly mentioned in the guidelines.


Ok, let's say it the other way 'round. Why did you think that one may not combine a parallel design with truncated AUC? I would say it's important to comprehend the 'sprit' (if any) behind guidelines and not to search all the time for a 100 % literally match with you intended design. The main reasons for a parallel design are quite clearly stated in GLs and I don't repeat them here. Truncated AUC helps in preventing drop-outs due to long sampling (or just missing samples). One might even get a better estimate of Cmax, since with the savings in budget, more frequent sampling in the earlier part of the profile becomes affordable.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
300 visitors (0 registered, 300 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5