Deficiency centers [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-12-17 16:52 (6038 d 06:35 ago) – Posting: # 4496
Views: 6,796

Dear D. Labes,

❝ If I understand you right you suggest me to do the usual evaluation

❝ (ignoring the centers) and to wait for a deficiency letter?


First part: yes, second part: no.
OK, all of us are waiting for deficiency letters all the time. So it doesn't make a difference here. :lol3:

❝ And if it happens (low chance) then answer "Due to the identical protocol,

❝ due to the identical handling of blood samples, central assay of the blood

❝ samples, blah, blah ... no influence of the different centers was expected

❝ at all."? Eventually this could/should be included in the study report

❝ beforehand.


I would suggest to write the "blahblah" in the study protocol (not the report).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
301 visitors (0 registered, 301 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5