Supportive data? [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-07-31 21:39 (6175 d 18:33 ago) – Posting: # 4003
Views: 9,367

Dear ElMaestro,

your first paragraph is a perfect aggregation. :crying:

❝ Because of this it is difficult for me to understand what supportive data are or when they become handy or make a difference. In fact I could be afraid we are getting to a point where supportive data could not be used by an applicant to claim BE but could be used by regulators as basis for rejections.


Last January in Bonn I asked Jan Welink what ‘supportive’ actually means. He said: ‘Only means ±SD, plasma profiles, etc. – no calculation of a point estimate and con­fidence interval.’ The other six members of the PK-group on the panel agreed. No dis­agreement from the Austrian member (he was in the audience). The member from Hungary was absent; no idea about the French one (anonymous). So what it is it for? Back to eye-ball pharmacokinetics (‘Well, that's a nice curve – but look at the strange secondary peak at 12 hours…’)!

❝ Anyone else been thinking thoughts like this, …


Looking for a passionate heretic - gimme a call!

❝ … or am I alone in the universe?


Don’t know – have you ever considered joining SETI?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
341 visitors (0 registered, 341 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5