Sampling Time points in Bioequivalence studies [Design Issues]
Dear Taresh,
There are many people with more experience of your problem on this board however as it's been quiet I will make a couple of suggestions. The best way to assess the impact of sampling time point selection is to Simulate the trial with different schedules. If you overlay the time-conc plots you will see how Cmax, Tmax & AUC can be affected very easily. I would also review the partial derivative plots for each parameter.
Furthermore you can use diagnostic parameters e.g. VIF (Variance Inflation Factor - available in WinNonlin etc.) to assess 'objectively' the better schedule to best estimate your parameters of interest since there will always be a compromise.
I can suggest a free webinar that discuss some of the problems so might be useful to you as background;
"Critical Path Approach for Development of Generic Products"
During this presentation some suggestions are made that maybe useful for you to bear in mind;
Absorption phase should include 3-5 sampling time points
Cmax region should include 4-8 sampling time points (remember Cmax/Tmax is often the most variable and easy to 'miss')
Distribution and Elimination phases should include 4-10 sampling time points
If you take the maximum of all of these you have 23 timepoints; generally I would expect some trade-off but overall I would aim that the length of sampling schedule should be at least 4-5 half-life of drug to accurately assess total AUC (so AUClast is >80% AUCinf).
Simon.
There are many people with more experience of your problem on this board however as it's been quiet I will make a couple of suggestions. The best way to assess the impact of sampling time point selection is to Simulate the trial with different schedules. If you overlay the time-conc plots you will see how Cmax, Tmax & AUC can be affected very easily. I would also review the partial derivative plots for each parameter.
Furthermore you can use diagnostic parameters e.g. VIF (Variance Inflation Factor - available in WinNonlin etc.) to assess 'objectively' the better schedule to best estimate your parameters of interest since there will always be a compromise.
I can suggest a free webinar that discuss some of the problems so might be useful to you as background;
"Critical Path Approach for Development of Generic Products"
During this presentation some suggestions are made that maybe useful for you to bear in mind;
Absorption phase should include 3-5 sampling time points
Cmax region should include 4-8 sampling time points (remember Cmax/Tmax is often the most variable and easy to 'miss')
Distribution and Elimination phases should include 4-10 sampling time points
If you take the maximum of all of these you have 23 timepoints; generally I would expect some trade-off but overall I would aim that the length of sampling schedule should be at least 4-5 half-life of drug to accurately assess total AUC (so AUClast is >80% AUCinf).
Simon.
—
Simon
Senior Scientific Trainer, Certara™
[link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX-yCO5Rzag[/link]
https://www.certarauniversity.com/dashboard
https://support.certara.com/forums/
Simon
Senior Scientific Trainer, Certara™
[link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX-yCO5Rzag[/link]
https://www.certarauniversity.com/dashboard
https://support.certara.com/forums/
Complete thread:
- Sampling Time points in Bioequivalence studies taresh41 2009-07-20 09:27
- Sampling Time points in Bioequivalence studiesSDavis 2009-07-23 09:26
- Sampling Time points in Bioequivalence studies taresh41 2009-08-21 07:57
- Truncation does not reduce the number of samples Helmut 2009-08-21 13:59
- Truncation does not reduce the number of samples taresh41 2009-08-24 05:41
- Truncation does not reduce the number of samples Helmut 2009-08-21 13:59
- Sampling Time points in Bioequivalence studies taresh41 2009-08-21 07:57
- Sampling Time points in Bioequivalence studiesSDavis 2009-07-23 09:26
