time points and study design [Design Issues]

posted by drmuneesh – 2009-03-31 13:04 (6297 d 13:58 ago) – Posting: # 3422
Views: 5,051

Dear All

I am planning a BE study of Bicalutamide 150 mg tablet. The two (R) & (S) - enantiomers of Bicalutamide have different pharmacokinetics. Tmax of active (R)- enantiomer is 15-48 hr and that of inactive (S)- enantiomer is 2-5 hr. T1/2 of active (R)- enantiomer is about 1 week and that of (S)- enantiomer is 19 hr.

The study has been planned with the parallel truncated design upto 72 hrs and time points for blood sample collection are 0.00, 1.00, 2.00, 3.00, 4.00, 5.00, 6.00, 8.00, 12.00, 14.00, 15.00, 16.00, 18.00, 24.00, 28.00, 32.00, 36.00, 40.00, 44.00, 46.00, 48.00, 50.00, 60.00 and 72.00.

Please suggest:
  1. Should we measure the racemate Bicalutamide or perform an enantiomer specific assay (i.e. active (R)- enantiomer)?
  2. Is the study design ok and are the time points selected for blood sample collection appropriate so as to capture the real Cmax?
  3. Is the 150 mg dose is safe in healthy human subjects?
  4. What should be the sample size?

Regards
Dr Muneesh Garg

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
315 visitors (0 registered, 315 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5