Truncated or Parallel Design [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-12-06 17:18 (6416 d 00:14 ago) – Posting: # 2890
Views: 3,951

Dear Santosh!

❝ when tel is equal or more than 24 hours, then we will go for

❝ Truncated, but what is limit for tel for Truncated design? when

❝ we go for parallel design (what is limit for tel for parallel

❝ design)?


There's no agreement, but Canada suggested 24 hours in 2005. The European Draft Guideline from 2008 suggested no sampling beyond 72 hours for all IR formulations irrespective of the half-life.

❝ when we go for parallel design (what is limit for tel for

❝ parallel design)?


It's up to you. ± points you should consider:
- Power (for a given sample size) in a parallel design is lower than in a cross-over
+ Less chance for drop-outs in a long wash-out

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
210 visitors (0 registered, 210 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5