Truncated or Parallel Design [Design Issues]
Dear Santosh!
There's no agreement, but Canada suggested 24 hours in 2005. The European Draft Guideline from 2008 suggested no sampling beyond 72 hours for all IR formulations irrespective of the half-life.
It's up to you. ± points you should consider:
- Power (for a given sample size) in a parallel design is lower than in a cross-over
+ Less chance for drop-outs in a long wash-out
❝ when tel is equal or more than 24 hours, then we will go for
❝ Truncated, but what is limit for tel for Truncated design? when
❝ we go for parallel design (what is limit for tel for parallel
❝ design)?
There's no agreement, but Canada suggested 24 hours in 2005. The European Draft Guideline from 2008 suggested no sampling beyond 72 hours for all IR formulations irrespective of the half-life.
❝ when we go for parallel design (what is limit for tel for
❝ parallel design)?
It's up to you. ± points you should consider:
- Power (for a given sample size) in a parallel design is lower than in a cross-over
+ Less chance for drop-outs in a long wash-out
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Truncated or Parallel Design santosh.awale 2008-12-06 12:48
- Truncated or Parallel DesignHelmut 2008-12-06 16:18
- Truncated or Parallel Design santosh.awale 2008-12-08 07:02
- Truncated or Parallel DesignHelmut 2008-12-06 16:18
