BE study for Minoxidil [Design Issues]

posted by drgunasakaran1  – 2025-02-21 01:57 (482 d 06:17 ago) – Posting: # 24369
Views: 5,815

❝ As per FDA guidance the in-vivo BE route for Minoxidil 5% topical requires a clinical endpoint study because the drug cannot be quantified in plasma due to its low system bioavailability (1.4%) when administered topically. Since this guidance was written in 2011, is it possible to suggest a PK BE study now since we have systems that are capable of measure drugs at very low concentrations?

Hi Jag009,
Approximately 1.4% of topical minoxidil is absorbed through the skin. It may be inadequate to establish bioequivalence using pharmacokinetic parameters alone, given that the final site of action is topical. Therefore, the FDA may still consider conducting a clinical endpoint study to demonstrate equivalence for Minoxidil 5% Topical aerosol foam. Furthermore, it is highly recommended to communicate with the FDA and submit the study protocol before initiating any pharmacokinetic study for minoxidil.

Dr Gunasakaran Sambandan MD
Disclaimer: The replies/posts are my personal opinions, and they do not represent my company's views on the same. LinkedIn

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
166 visitors (0 registered, 166 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5