Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • My record: ≈400

My record: ≈400 [Design Issues]

posted by Achievwin – US, 2024-05-03 15:49 (775 d 09:22 ago) – Posting: # 23978
Views: 8,297

❝ Define magnitude. :-D If you mean hundreds, yes. Multi-center in patients.

❝ BTW, I have seen 4-period full replicate studies with 180 healthy volunteers…

wow for a full replicate N=400 the sponsor has deep pockets…

Thanks for your response

Complete thread:

Large sample size in a BE study Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:28
- My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 13:34
  - My record: ≈400Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:49
    - My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 14:19
  - My record: ≈400 nobody 2024-05-03 18:44
    - n=180 4-period full replicate Helmut 2024-05-03 22:25
      - n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-06 15:56
        
        HVNTID! mittyri 2024-05-07 07:35
      - n=180 4-period full replicate dshah 2024-05-08 16:11
        
        Lousy T/R-ratio Helmut 2024-05-08 16:18
        n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-17 13:45

Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
257 visitors (0 registered, 257 guests [including 126 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution. Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz