Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Stratify for sex?

Stratify for sex? [Design Issues]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2020-05-25 23:10 (2210 d 23:48 ago) – Posting: # 21465
Views: 9,223

Hi Helmut,

I was referring to generating the randomization list (you know, unlike the CRO who put first 10 males and next 10 females..)

❝ Reduced chance to “grab her by the p••••y” whilst lining up for phlebotomy.

❝ ❝ No I did not find that funny when I spoke w them.

❝ I would.

Well if I had good impression of their overall capability, yes... But on not that day...

J

Edit: two successive posts merged [Ohlbe]

Complete thread:

Inclusion criteria in BE studies Loky do 2020-05-22 18:16
- BE: ♀♂ Helmut 2020-05-23 17:12
- Inclusion criteria in BE studies jag009 2020-05-25 07:43
  - Stratify for sex? Helmut 2020-05-25 12:48
    - Stratify for sex?jag009 2020-05-25 21:10
- Inclusion criteria in BE studies ElMaestro 2020-05-25 14:39
  - Inclusion criteria in BE studies Loky do 2020-06-10 13:19
  - Inclusion criteria in BE studies BEQool 2023-05-05 10:42
    - Sex-by-treatment interaction Helmut 2023-05-05 12:44
      - Sex-by-treatment interaction BEQool 2023-05-11 09:12

Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
110 visitors (0 registered, 110 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have never in my life learned anything
from any man who agreed with me. Dudley Field Malone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz