No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-06 15:47 (2397 d 03:43 ago) – Posting: # 20942
Views: 12,681

Ahoy my capt’n and welcome back to this side of the pond!

❝ I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers …


Those days when studies were evaluated by a paired t-test with a pocket calculator?

❝ – I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.


Correct. If we would be allowed (pun!) to use a mixed-effects model. Patterson and Jones argued against this doubtful practice and the ethical implications of discarding data.*



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
304 visitors (0 registered, 304 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5