Consider 505(b)(2) Pathway [Design Issues]

posted by bebac_fan – US, 2018-05-05 19:08 (2967 d 07:17 ago) – Posting: # 18756
Views: 4,420

I think this would need to go through a NDA/505(b)(2) pathway rather than an ANDA.

In this case, comparative efficacy, rather than BE, will be considered pivotal.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
150 visitors (0 registered, 150 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5