Consider 505(b)(2) Pathway [Design Issues]

posted by bebac_fan – US, 2018-05-05 19:08 (2566 d 10:33 ago) – Posting: # 18756
Views: 3,486

I think this would need to go through a NDA/505(b)(2) pathway rather than an ANDA.

In this case, comparative efficacy, rather than BE, will be considered pivotal.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
133 visitors (0 registered, 133 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t undertake a project
unless it’s manifestly important
and nearly impossible.    Edwin H. Land

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5