Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Any post about difference between 4x4 and 4x2 in bioequivalence studies? [Design Issues]

posted by Mauricio Sampaio – Brazil, 2016-11-03 19:54 (3519 d 20:56 ago) – Posting: # 16769
Views: 8,307

I am looking for a post in this forum that explain what is the best design to replicate a bioequivalence study. The 4x4 or 4x2? Normally, I use 4x4 this is a best choice? Or I can use 4x2 with same eficcacy?

Complete thread:

Any post about difference between 4x4 and 4x2 in bioequivalence studies?Mauricio Sampaio 2016-11-03 18:54
- Not more than 2 sequences in full replicates Helmut 2016-11-03 19:38
  - Not more than 2 sequences in full replicates Astea 2016-11-04 08:22
    - Only RR is used Helmut 2016-11-11 20:52
  - Not more than 2 sequences in full replicates Mauricio Sampaio 2016-11-11 18:39

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
142 visitors (0 registered, 142 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution. Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz