1999 Note for Guidance? [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-30 15:37 (3677 d 05:57 ago) – Posting: # 16371
Views: 6,248

Hi Mahesh,

❝ As per SPC “No accumulation is observed after repeated administration of up to 2000mg of metformin as prolonged release tablets then why applicant performed multiple dose study?


See this thread. We don’t know when the studies supporting this application were performed. According to the NfG of 1999 multiple dose was mandatory – unless you convinced regulators of the opposite (scientific advice, etc.). The current GL – which allows waiving the multiple dose study under certain conditions – came into effect on 1 July 2015.
Low accumulation indeed: “Out of 66 [33 Subjects × 2 periods] possible values, only 27 values were plausible, rest were BLQ and therefore Cτ,ss was not acceptable and hence, not considered for bioequivalence equation.”

BTW, as usual in Indian studies the – irrelevant – “post hoc power” is wrong. Given these numbers in the PAR the assessors’ knowledge appears in a bad light.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
141 visitors (0 registered, 141 guests [including 32 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5