1999 Note for Guidance? [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-30 15:37 (3683 d 01:30 ago) – Posting: # 16371
Views: 6,277

Hi Mahesh,

❝ As per SPC “No accumulation is observed after repeated administration of up to 2000mg of metformin as prolonged release tablets then why applicant performed multiple dose study?


See this thread. We don’t know when the studies supporting this application were performed. According to the NfG of 1999 multiple dose was mandatory – unless you convinced regulators of the opposite (scientific advice, etc.). The current GL – which allows waiving the multiple dose study under certain conditions – came into effect on 1 July 2015.
Low accumulation indeed: “Out of 66 [33 Subjects × 2 periods] possible values, only 27 values were plausible, rest were BLQ and therefore Cτ,ss was not acceptable and hence, not considered for bioequivalence equation.”

BTW, as usual in Indian studies the – irrelevant – “post hoc power” is wrong. Given these numbers in the PAR the assessors’ knowledge appears in a bad light.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
281 visitors (0 registered, 281 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5