Investigation of ... [Design Issues]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-05-04 10:43 (3698 d 22:25 ago) – Posting: # 16279
Views: 10,070

Dear Helmut,

❝ We are performing a comparative bioavailability study (the experiment) and are hoping for bioequivalence (the desired result).


Up to now my understanding of a bioavailability study was: A study with the aim to study the extent of availability in the body, without the aim to show equivalence. F.i. intra-venious application versus oral.

❝ The assessor describes his hobby like this: “If you already know the result (bioequivalence) why do you want to perform a study?” ;-)


IMHO this is a very sophisticated and nitpicking attitude, suitable to wow NLYW :-D.
In the same spirit you can't speak about non-inferiority or superiority studies.
But: "Jedem Tierchen sein Pläsierchen" (rough translation "To each their own"). Especially if it (the beastie) is an assessor.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
152 visitors (0 registered, 152 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5