High CV? [Design Issues]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-05-03 23:07 (3706 d 06:44 ago) – Posting: # 16276
Views: 9,323

Dear Helmut,

❝ Adding to Detlew’s wise words: For a CVwR of 54% I would expect no inflation of the TIE with the FDA’s RSABE and practically none with the EMA’s ABEL.


where did this CVwR you mention came from? I couldn't detect such a number in this thread. Did you use a crystal ball [image] to figure it out in M.tareq's post? Or do you have some insider information?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
237 visitors (0 registered, 237 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5