Bioequivalence study [Design Issues]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-05-03 17:50 (3703 d 23:40 ago) – Posting: # 16272
Views: 10,187

Hi Helmut,

❝ I know one European assessor who rejects protocols containing the word bioequivalence in its title. Yes, even if it is a study of IR vs. IR.


❝ Homework: Why does he do so?


To be not bounded by an document called "GUIDELINE ON THE INVESTIGATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE" in his assessment? :-D

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
132 visitors (0 registered, 132 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5