Naproxen 220mg [Design Issues]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2016-03-07 14:12 (3764 d 17:58 ago) – Posting: # 16066
Views: 3,935

Dear aanrin
What would be the reason for conducting a BE study of naproxen 220mg against the competitor strength of 200mg? Both formulation should not be bioequivalent, right? A medicinal product is therapeutically equivalent with another product if it contains the same active substance or therapeutic moiety and, clinically, shows the same efficacy and safety as that product, whose efficacy and safety has been established. In practice, demonstration of bioequivalence is generally the most appropriate method of substantiating therapeutic equivalence. Your product is not therapeutically equivalent and therefore you will need data for safety and efficacy of your own formulation (strength). So you are obliged to conduct at least one phase III study.
I hope this helps.
Kind regards
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
389 visitors (0 registered, 389 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5