R-SABE and ABEL versus Blood Volume [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-08-11 18:41 (3975 d 20:02 ago) – Posting: # 15232
Views: 6,229

Hi Lucas,

yep, combos can be challenging when it comes to the blood volume. What I have seen is to optimize the sampling schedule for each drug and split samples accordingly. Drawbacks:

❝ is it possible to not use the replicated samples for the other 2 drugs and apply conventional ABE for them, and consider the replication only for the HVD?


Not sure whether I understand you. Can you post sequences / periods you have in mind?

❝ Other option would be to use Balaam's 4x2 design, but I don't think that someone has budget for that... :-D


Correct. In Balaam’s design we throw away half of the sample size in the estimation of T/R. Furthermore, I don’t know how to estimate the sample size. RT|TR|RR|TT is currently not implemented in PowerTOST sampleN.scABEL().

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
153 visitors (0 registered, 153 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5