MR vs. Russian experts [Design Issues]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2015-07-30 13:04 (3987 d 07:32 ago) – Posting: # 15174
Views: 7,511

(edited on 2015-07-30 15:24)

Hi BE-proff,

❝ But you give references to western guides in submitted documents they are usually accepted by Russian experts ;-)


Sorry for misunderstanding, I corrected the previous post to be in accordance with russian GL.
There are no links to the EMA/FDA GL in russian "Red Book" (I mean this chapter)
Yes, the experts accept the EMA/FDA approaches if you provide the appropriate link.
BTW did you see at least one plan of studies in accordance with EMA MR GL (for example) in Russia?
Even for MR vs. MR studies the requirements stated in the EMA GL are not satisfied. Providing the results of only one BE study performed in Russia (i.e. single dose fed or single dose fasting) is sufficient for registration purposes.

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
305 visitors (0 registered, 305 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5