ANVISA - SABE [Design Issues]

posted by Samaya B – India, 2015-04-27 14:03 (4072 d 05:05 ago) – Posting: # 14743
Views: 9,093

Hi Luvblooms

❝ You just got lucky!!!! That's all I will say as per my interaction with ANVISA. They are tough nut to crack!!


True.. that is the reason I have mentioned to submit a protocol with replicated design for ANVISA review before initiating a study.

❝ Does this mean that widening given only for Cmax and max limit will be 69-143?


During ANVISA review, the agency had asked us to follow EU guidance for widening. (so I assume widening would be applicable to Cmax only).

❝ Any specific reason behind it?


Not sure!


Regards,
Samaya

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
154 visitors (0 registered, 154 guests [including 32 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5