Problematic design [Design Issues]

posted by kumarnaidu – Mumbai, India, 2014-12-26 06:38 (4195 d 03:55 ago) – Posting: # 14176
Views: 20,354

Hi helmut,
Like kvgreddy I also encountered with same situation. We want to study the two test product and as per the literature the reference is HVD and some PK experts from CRO suggesting this design for pilot BE study. I suggested them to perform 3-way study with T1 T2 R as in pilot study we only want to know the T/R ratio. and the best test product will be used further for the pivotal (3way or 4way reference replicate) study. But my people also think that 4way pilot study with reference replicate will give them the correct idea.

CRO suggested the below sequence
T1  T2  R   R
T2  R   R   T1
R   R   T1  T2
R   T1  T2  R

Here the condition 2 is satisfied but not 3.
R : 2×P1, 2×P2, 2×P3, 2×P4
T1: 1×P1, 1×P2, 1×P3, 1×P4
T2: 1×P1, 1×P2, 1×P3, 1×P4


As you rightly said in your previous post that full balance could only be achieved if all 4! = 24 permutations are used which is imposible for the pilot study with 24 subjects.

Thanks

Kumar Naidu

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
127 visitors (0 registered, 127 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5