cortisol suppression as clinical endpoint [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-09-11 01:42 (4301 d 12:26 ago) – Posting: # 13479
Views: 14,328

Dear lizhao,

❝ I can think of two kinds of study designs:

❝ 1. baseline1 → Test treatment → washout period → baseline2 → Reference treatment


❝ 2. baseline → Test treatment → Reference treatment


The first suggestion is a potential winner. You'll always have pre-dose samples so no reason not to address the baseline in it.
But on the other hand, what do you know about wash-out and potential for carryover? Some companies lean towards parallel designs. It is a very complicated matter.

My sixth sense tells me you might be working on an inhaled formulation? In that case, to be honest: At the moment many, many, many companies including some from the world's top 10 are outright failing their Cortisol suppression studies even though they have invested lots and lots of resources in formulations, good CROs (actually they seem to pick cheap ones over good ones) and expensive experts to help them. The literature is no help, you will not see what doesn't work in papers. So take my advice: Don't do it. If you are in a situation where your formulation needs a CS study there is probably a reason behind it such as a failed safety PK study, a desire for a children's indication or other stuff which just spells trouble.

❝ Can somebody tell me which one is the right one? If either one is correct, can you please tell me the study design recommended by EMA or FDA?

  1. Don't do it.
  2. If you ignore pt. 1, then at least take scientific advice / protocol assistance at the authority to get the design right. If your boss tells you that there is no time or no budget for it, then you need a new boss.
Check out this link and refs in the paper it links to.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
126 visitors (0 registered, 126 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5