replicate design- completion of study [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2007-11-22 10:46 (6794 d 16:05 ago) – Posting: # 1322
Views: 3,535

Dear Shankaranarayanan!

❝ As you mentioned in this post "were the concentrations higher than 'normal'" should be excluded, subjected with the reason. I think you mean to say the subject is an outlier. Which should be dropped based on pk/statistical analysis.


I did not mean that. At least according to European guidelines biosamples of a subject who dropped out from a study (for any reason), must be analysed and accounted for. Just imagine a situation where a subject withdraw consent continuing the study because of adverse events (e.g., heavy headaches). If you administered a modified release formulation which might be subjected to a sudden release of drug, it's quite interesting to see such a relationship.

This has nothing to do with exclusion of a subject.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
184 visitors (0 registered, 184 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5