Topical ointment Clinical Trial US and EU [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-07-03 16:05 (4370 d 11:53 ago) – Posting: # 13212
Views: 3,263

Hello Samaya,

❝ We are developing a topical ointment (5-Fluorouracil) for US and EU.

❝ As of now we plan to conduct three arm study (Test product, US reference product, Placebo) to file in US. Is there any chance that MHRA (EU regulatory authority) will accept this study?? or we should include EU reference product as well i.e. four arm study (Test product, US reference product, EU reference product, Placebo)?


Almost zero chance for EU approval without an EU-sourced ref. product, I think.

❝ Secondly, if four arm study is conducted then MHRA and FDA would accept the statistical significance of clinical data?


Likely, yes. But you should get sc. advice first to have confirmed that they will accept the US-inspired protocol. Or you should submit in a non-UK country country as RMS in a DCP - this can radically increase your chance of success even in the UK., even if this sounds a bit counter-intuitive to you.

❝ Lastly, whether study should include subjects from different parts of India / US /EU or only Indian population would suffice??


I don't think that populations should affect the success proportion of T vs R. So my guess -and I stress: this is a guess- is that Indian subjects would be OK for approval in both US and EU. As I read the US guidance, little is dictated re. the origin of the subjects.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
128 visitors (0 registered, 128 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5