Glatiramer Acetate [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2014-03-07 12:48 (4495 d 14:55 ago) – Posting: # 12573
Views: 5,592

(edited on 2014-03-07 14:26)

❝ ..The agency also stated that it may require a generic company to prove sameness "although we cannot state with any certainty what these criteria may be. A finding of sameness does not, however, necessitate a finding of ‘complete chemical identity’. Thus, the agency may consider other criteria to determine sameness, taking into account the complexity of the active ingredient.


Decision by the FDA might be available as early as May 2014. Good luck with BE-study (and some good lawyers, too, maybe?) :-D

Regards


btw: Strange that for a chemically undefined compound with parenteral application mode a BE study should provide meaningful data to support therapeutic equivalence for an ANDA...

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
389 visitors (0 registered, 389 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5