Glatiramer Acetate [Design Issues]

posted by drgunasakaran1  – 2014-03-06 18:26 (4498 d 14:46 ago) – Posting: # 12570
Views: 5,594

Dear Mr Chirag,

In his response to Teva's second citizen petition, FDA asserted its ‘broad discretion’ in determining whether the submitted information (conventional bioequivalence study) is enough to conclude that the generic product is the same as the original. The agency also stated that it may require a generic company to prove sameness "although we cannot state with any certainty what these criteria may be. A finding of sameness does not, however, necessitate a finding of ‘complete chemical identity’. Thus, the agency may consider other criteria to determine sameness, taking into account the complexity of the active ingredient.

Hence, you can conduct bioequivalence study for ANDA, however, it is upto FDA to give final nod on the approval of bioequivalence study.

Dr Gunasakaran Sambandan MD
Disclaimer: The replies/posts are my personal opinions, and they do not represent my company's views on the same. LinkedIn

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
260 visitors (0 registered, 260 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5