Trial and error [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-02-26 14:53 (4499 d 00:56 ago) – Posting: # 12509
Views: 7,047

Hi Silva,

❝ What do you consider a sufficiently large sample size? ≥34? ≥46? ≥56?


“Sufficiently large” is the term commonly used by statisticians if they want to stay vague and don’t have the balls to come up with a particular number. :-D
Simply give it a try. I guess that for small sample sizes (e.g., 12) in the worst case you will have to start the randomization-algo more than once – with different seeds – in order to get everything balanced.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
149 visitors (0 registered, 149 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5