Log in
Registerwhy not 72? [Design Issues]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2014-01-22 14:19 (4542 d 16:09 ago) – Posting: # 12227
Views: 4,376
Hi Kasthurirk,
You are free to do whatever you want. If you want to get some qualified opinions, don’t force us to read tea-leaves. IR/MR? Half-live? Variable clearance? Regulatory agency? Why not 72 h?
❝ Can we do the truncated for 96.00 hrs? If can, AUC0-96.00 is acceptable.
You are free to do whatever you want. If you want to get some qualified opinions, don’t force us to read tea-leaves. IR/MR? Half-live? Variable clearance? Regulatory agency? Why not 72 h?
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- 96.00 hrs Truncated kasthurirk 2014-01-22 10:24
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- why not 72?Helmut 2014-01-22 13:19
- why not 72? jag009 2014-01-22 21:34
- why not 72? Helmut 2014-01-23 16:16
- why not 72? kasthurirk 2014-01-23 06:25
- why not 72? Helmut 2014-01-23 16:09
- why not 72? jag009 2014-01-22 21:34
- why not 72?Helmut 2014-01-22 13:19
Ing. Helmut Schütz