design [Design Issues]

posted by kvgreddy06 – India, 2013-12-30 17:48 (4558 d 14:19 ago) – Posting: # 12114
Views: 22,192

Dear All,

kindly provide which one is possible and advantages, disadvantages.

design,
Test product (A)
Test Product (B)
Reference Product (C)
here i am using reference product twice,

* : Three treatment, four period, four sequences crossover reference replicated
[image]

**: Three treatment, four period Three sequences, crossover reference replicated

[image]


Among those which one is suitable, or any other one

one of my friend suggesting **:
study is a reference replicate study with two test treatment and the analysis will be done separately for both the test product by using the sequences ACC, CAC and CCA for test product A and BCC, CBC and CCB for test product B which is derived from the original sequences ABCC ,CABC & CCAB . However the derived sequences met the criteria of classical reference replicate study design and sequence (TRR, RRT and RTR) and the same number of sequence order will not be able to generate from the four sequences.

Thanku..

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5