3-arm bio study [Design Issues]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2013-06-20 11:30 (4753 d 06:54 ago) – Posting: # 10835
Views: 3,473

Dear Rocky
for a reasonable reply I would need some further information. First why did you think, that a bio study was not required? A BCS class I or III biowaiver does not apply (non-linearity, variable absorption).
According to CPMP/QWP/EWP/1401/98 Rev. 1 bioequivalence should in most cases be established both at the highest strength and at the lowest strength for drugs with a less than proportional increase in AUC with increasing dose over the therapeutic dose range. However you have the problem, that for the lowest strength you have no reference product. Testing of 2.5mg x 4 vs 10mg x 1 would be of no help if the non-linearity is not caused by limited solubility but is due to e.g. saturation of uptake transporters. A line extension (additional strength) would only be possible within the therapeutic dose range (strengths) covered by the originator. For additional strengths outside the originatorś dose range you need to submit clinical data.
BTW what does RMP & ERP mean?
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
136 visitors (0 registered, 136 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5