Analytical sensitivity issues? [Design Issues]

posted by Mohammed Ali – United Arab Emirates, 2013-04-28 10:22 (4810 d 09:34 ago) – Posting: # 10501
Views: 4,709

(edited on 2013-04-28 11:38)

❝ ❝ we are planning to do bioequivalence study on Azithromycin Caps,

❝ ❝ but whether we can use this methodology 2 capsule of 250mg of test & 2 caps of 250 mg of originator which will be equivalent to 500mg.


We need 500mg Approval not 250mg whether this is acceptable as same study is been performed by Teva.

❝ Why do you want to do that? Do you want to market only the 250 mg strength? If yes, perform a study with 1×1 250 mg. Only in rare cases (problems with the sensitivity of the analytical method) your design would makes sense. I don’t think any regulator would accept such a justification for azithromycin.


We need to market 500mg only. whether this is acceptable.


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Jaime]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
174 visitors (0 registered, 174 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5