Beware of flip-flop PK [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-12 17:57 (4848 d 00:46 ago) – Posting: # 10193
Views: 4,441

❝ Is anyone aware of the guidelines for truncation of AUC at 72 hrs for modified release products having longer half life.


I don’t know any. If IR is concerned long half life is irrelevant for truncation (see EMA’s GL); it’s high time for the FDA to revise their guidance. :-D The 72 hours are based on the longest passage time of a formulation in the GIT.
If the MR formulation is DR IMHO truncation should be applicable as well.
For CR you might observed flip-flop PK – terminal phase represents absorption or is at least influenced by it. Personally I would be very wary to even use AUCt as the main metric. I would rather use AUC and aim for an extrapolated area of well below 20%.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
165 visitors (0 registered, 165 guests [including 33 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5