Beware of flip-flop PK [Design Issues]
❝ Is anyone aware of the guidelines for truncation of AUC at 72 hrs for modified release products having longer half life.
I don’t know any. If IR is concerned long half life is irrelevant for truncation (see EMA’s GL); it’s high time for the FDA to revise their guidance.
The 72 hours are based on the longest passage time of a formulation in the GIT.If the MR formulation is DR IMHO truncation should be applicable as well.
For CR you might observed flip-flop PK – terminal phase represents absorption or is at least influenced by it. Personally I would be very wary to even use AUCt as the main metric. I would rather use AUC∞ and aim for an extrapolated area of well below 20%.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Truncated AUC for modified release products cakhatri 2013-03-12 16:44
- Beware of flip-flop PKHelmut 2013-03-12 16:57
- Beware of flip-flop PK jag009 2013-03-12 20:24
- Beware of flip-flop PKHelmut 2013-03-12 16:57
