randomization: runs test? validation? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2012-06-16 15:10 (5126 d 02:30 ago) – Posting: # 8753
Views: 15,522

Dear Helmut!

Q1: What is the rationale behind using the runs test :confused:.
What did a randomisation based on this achieve extra compared to a randomization using lots, a hat and a NLYW dancing around it while drawing from the lots?

Q2: What can we do in validating a randomisation software or hardware as described above?
Remember your nice own post of a scene from Dilbert's life.
[image]

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
325 visitors (0 registered, 325 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5