Prodrug (FDA) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-03-16 13:27 (5215 d 21:15 ago) – Posting: # 8283
Views: 5,382

Dear Gunasakaran & John!

❝ As per Canadian BE guidance […]



Since John mentioned the term “ANDA” in his/her post I guess we should refer to FDA’s practice – which is inconsistent. The prodrug should be targeted whenever possible. If we have a look at product-specific guidances, we find different cases, e.g.,Supportive data are: Individual and mean concentrations, individual and mean PK metrics, geometric means and ratios of means for AUC and Cmax.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
369 visitors (0 registered, 369 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5