Therapeutic Equivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by JMCardot  – France, 2011-10-24 23:16 (5361 d 01:54 ago) – Posting: # 7539
Views: 7,802

Hello,

Have also a look on http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Presentation/2011/06/WC500107873.pdf which gives another definition not better and in contradiction with the definition given for bioequivalence in http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2010/12/WC500099907.pdf

Both documents being not so old (< 1 year) but I agree not compulsory and do not help to define adequatly the terms! I could be mistaken but when a term is used it must be defined and unless a revised definition is given the old one is valid. I know it is another age way of thinking. I stop here.

JM


Edit: Dear Jean-Michel, you are really consequent! Full quote removed. Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
320 visitors (0 registered, 320 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5