Therapeutic Equivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2011-10-24 15:51 (5361 d 23:20 ago) – Posting: # 7537
Views: 7,509

Hi JM,

❝ A simple question why you do not refer to the definitions which are in the old version of the EU guideline26 July 2001 CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98


I think it opens up a can of worms on steroids if we must rely on something in a document that has been formally replaced and made obsolete by another - perhaps not specifically in this context but very generally.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
263 visitors (0 registered, 263 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5