PHX/WNL vs. SAS [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-10-08 04:21 (5377 d 09:52 ago) – Posting: # 7449
Views: 16,375

Comrades!

❝ ❝ The SE and 90%CI for R and T are not equal within WNL and SAS, which will be reliable? (Even for equal sequences data)


❝ Wow! That's curious.


Mistery solved (?) after this post.

If you want to get in PHX/WNL the same LSMs/SE/CIs of treatments as in SAS you have to set all effects fixed.

Maybe you can try SAS’ Proc MIXED instead of Proc GLM and tweak it in order to give you LSMEANS similar to PHX/WNL.
But I’m not equipped with [image]

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
352 visitors (0 registered, 352 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5