Science ↔ Guidelines [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-06-07 01:25 (5503 d 14:05 ago) – Posting: # 7080
Views: 11,335

My Capt’n!

❝ Of course it is extremely informative what this document tell us:

...Common sense and a clear focus on the needs of the regulatory authority assessor are the best guides...


Ha! You dropped the start of the sentence: »It should be emphasised that no guideline can cover all eventualities, and common sense …«

❝ It is crystal clear, isn't it? When they speak of needs, I am pretty sure they mean something with coffee.


Don’t forget the whipped sweet cream on top.

❝ Or perhaps a forced parametric analysis when residuals are not normal. Or something like that.


Why not? To quote yourself:

Garbage in, garbage out.
It’s very very simple.


❝ Don't we all wish we could coerce or unduly influence?


Well; I’m neither the investigator nor member of the trial staff – if you mean §4.8.3. :pirate:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
232 visitors (0 registered, 232 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5